devonmanelski.com |
  |
Home | I.T. Management | Business Analysis & Project Management | VB.Net | SQL Server | About | |
Managing a technology landscape is similar to managing a project portfolio. Technology leaders must focus on re-balancing their technology portfolio in ways that will deliver the highest business return. Technology landscapes consist of several building blocks: systems that service commoditized information technology functions, software applications that fill emerging business needs, product platforms, networks, infrastructure, user devices, and telephony systems. The overarching themes when evaluating the trade-offs are: business value, cost, risk and security. These decisions have long shelf lives and incrementally create more issues as technologies age and are less competitive. Managing the evolution of the technology landscape from legacy to competitive solutions is one of the key challenges for technology leaders. As landscapes become more complex, the challenge can seem overwhelming. The Growth-Share Matrix is one of the best ways to organize the decision-making process.
The Boston Consulting Group engineered The Growth-Share Matrix which facilitates resource allocation decisions when managing business and product portfolios. A similar technique is helpful when making technology landscape investment decisions: invest, replace or shut down. The Growth-Share Matrix has four quadrants: Cash Cows, Dogs, Question Marks and Stars.
Mapping out the investments in your software, hardware and network assets facilitates the decision to invest, replace or shut down each of these investments. The goal is to ensure that while a significant portion of your technology investment is focused on maintaining your current level of business return; the portion of your technology investment that is focused on high growth-high value business return is allocated to the right software, hardware, and network solutions.